Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Grayson's avatar

In a letter in The Arizona Daily Star on Saturday, I brought up the Walkinshaw swearing-in the day after the election. Nothing is different except politics.

Unfortunately, I can't see a remedy coming from the courts, as some people have suggested. Under Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution, “Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members.” That means the House itself — not courts — has the ultimate authority to decide who is seated and when. Normally, once a state certifies the winner of a House election, the Speaker administers the oath, and the member is seated. But the House (through its leadership or by majority vote) can delay or even refuse to seat someone pending review.

Federal courts have consistently held that decisions about seating and swearing-in members of Congress are nonjusticiable political questions. In Powell v. McCormack (1969), where the Supreme Court ruled the House could not exclude a duly elected member who met constitutional qualifications, but that ruling came *after* the House had voted to exclude the Harlem congressman Adam Clayton Powell. Since then, courts have generally refused to interfere in timing or procedural matters of seating, seeing them as internal to the House.

It might be shocking to some, but Speaker Johnson can delay weeks or months before swearing in Adelita Grijalva, and there's apparently nothing unconstitutional about it as long as he eventually swears her in. This seems outrageous, especially when CD7 has been without representation for over half a year.

Only political pressure can make Johnson and the Republicans swear in our new congresswoman.

Expand full comment
Jerry Wilkerson's avatar

Ciscomani never listens to constituents. Our Congressman, Juan Ciscomani, is just a chicken, lacking political courage. He’s a scaredy-cat, hiding from voters and fearing questions from constituents—we the people who sent him to Washington. He ducks, dodges, and evades us when he's back home in southeast AZ, afraid of confrontation. Congressman Ciscomani refuses to hold town hall meetings in AZ CD6. He’s too scared to meet with the people he represents and explain his political votes against us in Washington. He’s simply a chicken.

So, let’s call Rep. Juan Ciscomani Congressman Chickenman. Cluck, cluck, cluck, and cock-a-doodle-doo, it’s Chickenman Ciscomani!

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts