Southern Arizonans can learn a lot from the state budget proposal that Republican lawmakers put out this week, even if Gov. Katie Hobbs is all but certain to veto it.

The package includes a grab-bag of cuts to Rio Nuevo and the University of Arizona, as well as other local institutions and projects.

It’s worth keeping an eye on — even though Hobbs has already signaled that she plans to veto it — because it tells you a lot about GOP lawmakers’ priorities, and some of those cuts might find their way into a compromise budget later on.

Plus, it’s an election year, so the proposal should give voters some idea of what would happen if they decide to replace Hobbs with a Republican governor this November.

And the budget gives us a chance to peer into the guts of Arizona government and see all the decisions, big and small, that end up in the state budget. For example, did you know there’s an “Arizona Navigable Stream Adjudication Commission”? How about a “Failing Schools Tutoring Fund”?

So today, we’re peeking into the budget docs to see what’s what, and how the plan would affect Southern Arizona.

Big picture

Broadly put, Hobbs is pushing for a $18.7 billion budget that includes some middle-class tax cuts.

GOP leaders at the Legislature proposed a $17.9 billion budget that they say includes one of the largest tax cuts in state history. It’ll cost the state around $1 billion over the next three years, as we conform to the tax cuts outlined in the federal “One, Big Beautiful Bill.”

Pima County Supervisor Andrés Cano, a Democrat who served in the state Legislature, said the cuts are short-sighted and will hurt the state and local economy in the long-term.

“This proposed budget would have a devastating impact to Pima County and our local economy. Gutting Rio Nuevo and the Arizona Commerce Authority will be devastating to locally-owned small businesses, restaurants, retail establishments, our tourism industry, and thousands of workers who need more support from our state — not less,” Cano said.

Local Democrats in the Legislature say the GOP’s proposal pays for its massive tax cuts by instituting draconian cuts to programs that low-income Arizonans need as inflation rises, like the Meals on Wheels program for seniors.

And at least one Tucson Democratic lawmaker, Rep. Alma Hernandez, says the state’s school voucher program should be on the chopping block, instead of programs like Meals on Wheels.

“I’ve heard now that this is a responsible budget, with our taxpayer dollars. If we wanted to be responsible, we’d be having a serious conversation about putting a cap on ESAs,” Hernandez said. “That’s a non-starter for many of you.”

Rio Nuevo

Among the several Southern Arizona specific hits, the GOP proposal would cut $19 million in sales tax diversion to Rio Nuevo.

The taxpayer-approved district skims a share of the state’s sales tax generated downtown and along the Broadway corridor — which diverts about $19 million a year into Rio Nuevo’s coffers.

Edmund Marquez, the chairman of Rio Nuevo, said about $8 million of that is used annually to pay back roughly $80 million in debt the taxing district had on its books from various economic deals that include numerous legally enforceable contracts with existing economic development deals.

The loss of $19 million in funding would likely have a domino effect beyond how the state would handle Rio Nuevo’s commitments, leading to canceled or delayed projects and, in some cases, legal fights that could cost more than the contracts themselves are worth.

Marquez said the group is exploring all of its options, including whether state lawmakers have the legal ability to interfere with a voter-approved district.

We’ll note that even at its peak of being unpopular for pie-in-the-sky projects like the downtown aquarium and “Rainbow Bridge,” lawmakers weren’t able to shut down Rio Nuevo.

Rio Nuevo apparently has an ally in Gov. Katie Hobbs, who says the district is too important for Tucson’s economy to terminate, per KGUN’s Craig Smith. Hobbs says she’ll make sure Republican lawmakers know she supports the district.

But Republicans seem set on cutting the funds.

“The question is, who should fund it?” Republican state Sen. John Kavanagh said of Rio Nuevo. “And you know, the people all over the state funded a development district in Tucson, and did it for a long time, but now we need the money, so we’ve decided to terminate that.”

The way Rio Nuevo works is some of the state’s portion of the sales tax generated within the district gets returned to Rio Nuevo to invest in infrastructure projects.

So Kavanagh’s assertion is technically true — people “all over the state” do fund it, but only if people all over the state shop in downtown Tucson.

UA on the hook for millions

The University of Arizona would take a huge hit under the GOP budget proposal, which cuts 5% from most state agencies, including the entire university system.

UA’s portion of that cut alone is more than $14.4 million between the main campus and the Health Sciences campus.

But the state would also stop paying nearly $5 million for the Yuma Center for Excellence for Desert Agriculture, Geological Survey, Extractive Modular Metallurgy Facility, On-Farm Irrigation Fund Deposit.

And the proposed budget would end about $500,000 of one-time funding from the UA’s AZ REACH program, a collaborative project between the Pima County Health Department, the American Indian Research Center for Health, and the Mexican American Studies Department at the University of Arizona.

We reached out to the University of Arizona a few times this week to get their thoughts on the budget, but the UA wasn’t willing to comment.

Other proposed cuts

Beyond the Southern Arizona-specific hits, the budget takes a chainsaw to agencies that serve the region.

For example, The Office of Tourism, which markets Tucson as a destination, would be completely zeroed out.

And nearly every other non-law-enforcement agency would see an across-the-board 5% cut.

We could go down the list, from the Department of Education’s $7 million cut, which will surely hurt Southern Arizona schools, to AHCCCS, the state Medicaid program that covers a huge share of Pima County residents, which would take a $10.6 million lump sum cut.

Not to mention, the budget repeals solar energy tax exemptions worth tens of millions, which would ripple through Southern Arizona’s solar industry.

But perhaps the bigger long-term hit comes from the fund sweeps that GOP lawmakers use to help balance the budget.

The proposal would sweep $25 million from the Arizona Board of Regents’ Technology and Research Initiative Fund, which is a major source of research funds for the UA. It would also sweep more than $26 million from the SMART Rural Transportation Fund, which helps pay for rural transportation projects from Sierra Vista to Yuma.

And it would cut about $12 million from the State Parks revenue Fund, which Southern Arizona State Parks rely on — think Kartchner Caverns and Catalina State Park.

But you said this budget is gonna get vetoed?

The GOP budget proposal won’t become law. Hobbs has already made that much clear.

But if Republican lawmakers continue to insist that the nearly $350 million in tax cuts this year are non-negotiable, those tax cuts are going to have to be paid for somehow.

So keep a close eye on the final version of the budget. Because as the two sides sit down to continue negotiating the budget, Southern Arizona’s funding will be on the table.

And if a Republican wins the Governor’s Office in November, this budget is a pretty good preview of what will be on the chopping block next year.

Upping the ante: Pima County Supervisor Matt Heinz says it’s time to seriously consider removing Sheriff Chris Nanos from office, per the Arizona Luminaria’s Carolina Cuellar. Heinz pointed to Nanos not submitting his answers to the supervisors’ questions under oath, as well as avoiding answering one of the supervisors’ questions about his work history. That refusal gives the supervisors an opening to invoke a rarely used state law that allows supervisors to remove another independently elected county official if they refuse to show up and answer questions.

“He just said you can’t ask me about this and this isn’t relevant so we’re not gonna answer it,” Heinz says. “That’s a refusal as I see it.”

Bodes well for Tucson and Pima County: Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes says the Phoenix City Council was well within its rights to pass an ordinance blocking ICE from using city property, the Arizona Mirror’s Gloria Rebecca Gomez reports. GOP lawmakers asked Mayes to investigate whether the Phoenix ordinance, which is nearly identical to ordinances passed in Tucson and Pima County, violated a state law that bars local governments from limiting federal law enforcement. If Mayes had decided the ordinance did violate state law, Phoenix (and Tucson) could have lost a huge chunk of their state-shared revenue.

Not so great for the San Pedro: The Arizona Court of Appeals dealt a blow to environmental groups that were trying to get state officials to protect the San Pedro River, Capitol scribe Howie Fischer reports. The court ruled that state law doesn’t spell out how often state water officials are supposed to review whether an area should get stricter groundwater pumping rules, only that officials should do “periodic reviews.” The Center for Biological Diversity’s Robin Silver said it was “laughable” that the “discretion” the court cited wouldn’t cover the 20 years it’s been since the San Pedro got a review.

Sold! To the giant mining company in the back: After months of protests from Southern Arizona residents and elected officials, Hudbay Minerals bought 160 acres of State Trust Land at an auction Wednesday, KVOA’s Eric Fink reports. Hudbay says the sale will turn a “landlocked, 160-acre parcel into a vital revenue stream for Arizona’s public schools.” Opponents say it’ll hurt local wildlife, water supplies, air quality and even the views from residents’ backyards.

“It's going to be a mile and a half from an elementary school and a 1,000-home subdivision,” Cathy McGrath, who lives near the 160 acres, said. “It just doesn't feel fair. I understand we need mining, I'm not opposed to mining. I just don't think a mine should penetrate an area that's been populated for a lot longer than they've even been around.”

You can help us outlast every mining company in Arizona by clicking this button.

He’s everywhere: Joe hosted the LD17 GOP debate on Thursday night in our partnership with the Arizona Clean Elections Commission. Watch it here. He is also a guest on the Bill Buckmaster Show today at noon, interviewing Congresswoman Adelita Grijalva. And he will be on Arizona Public Media’s The Press Room, which airs tonight at 8:30 p.m. on PBS 6.

Speaking of the GOP state budget proposal…

While the House passed the budget package on Wednesday, the Senate still hasn’t followed suit.

We caught a bit of Capitol gossip yesterday about why that is.

Apparently, one Republican is out with a death in the family. Which should be no big deal — since the Senate has 17 Republicans and only needs 16 votes to pass a budget.

So who’s the problem child?

That would be Republican Sen. Jake Hoffman, the serial killer of our bill to create a monument to assassinated journalist Don Bolles.

We hear the Freedom Caucus leader was trying to kill the budget bills in the House, but couldn’t whip a single vote against it.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading